You Just Inherited an IRA. Before You Touch That Money, Read This.
Direct Answer: Most people who inherit a traditional IRA or 401(k) have ten years to empty the account. How you take those distributions, all at once or spread across the decade, is one of the most consequential tax decisions you will ever make. A large distribution in a single year can push your income into the highest federal bracket, trigger state taxes, and create a Medicare premium spike two years later. The single most valuable move you can make is to call a qualified professional before you touch anything.
The phone call nobody is ready for arrives without warning. One of your parents is gone, and somewhere in the fog of grief and logistics, someone mentions the IRA. Maybe it is the financial institution calling to say the account needs to be addressed. Maybe it is a letter in the mail. Maybe you knew it was coming.
Either way, here is what most people do next. They ask the bank what their options are, hear the phrase “10-year rule,” and assume they have plenty of time to figure it out.
What they do not know, and what nobody at the bank is required to explain, is that how you handle the next few months could be one of the most consequential tax decisions you will ever make. A lot of people get it badly wrong, not because they are careless, but because nobody handed them a roadmap.
So consider this yours.
What the 10-Year Rule Actually Means
The SECURE Act, passed at the end of 2019, fundamentally changed the rules for inherited retirement accounts. Before that law, most heirs could stretch distributions out over their own life expectancy, which spread the tax burden across decades. Congress closed that door.
For most non-spouse beneficiaries today, the rule is straightforward: the entire account must be empty within ten years of the original owner’s death. That is not ten years to decide. That is ten years to drain it completely.
When a married couple is involved, the surviving spouse inherits differently. When that surviving spouse later passes, the IRA passes to the next generation with a fresh ten-year clock. How nuanced this gets depends entirely on your specific family situation.
Now ask yourself something. If your parent had $650,000 in a traditional IRA, and you earn $150,000 a year, and you pull that $650,000 out in year one, what happens to your tax return? You just added $650,000 in ordinary income on top of your existing salary. Your gross income for the year reaches $800,000 before any deductions. The federal rate on the top portion of that is 37 percent. Add your state’s cut, and somewhere between a third and nearly half of what your parent left you could disappear before you ever see it.
Is that the outcome they spent their whole life building?
The Most Important Question Nobody Asks: Did Your Parent Start Taking RMDs?
Here is where a lot of people get tripped up, and the IRS took a while to clarify this themselves. Your options depend significantly on whether your parent had already reached their Required Beginning Date, the age at which they were required to start taking withdrawals. Depending on when they were born, that age could have been as early as 70½ or 72. It is now 73 for those born between 1951 and 1959, and 75 for those born in 1960 or later.
If your parent passed before their Required Beginning Date, before RMDs had started, you generally have three options: take the entire account in year one, take distributions over the ten years in whatever amounts you choose as long as the account is empty by the end of year ten, or take nothing for years one through nine, let the money grow, and pull everything out in year ten.
That third option sounds appealing at first because you maximize the growth period. But when you think it through, you are concentrating an enormous tax bill into a single year at the exact moment your account is at its largest. When clients see that number, they rarely like it.
If your parent had already started taking RMDs, your options narrow considerably. You cannot defer everything until year ten. You must take at least the required minimum distribution each year, every year, for all ten years. You can take more than the minimum, but you cannot take less. And in year ten, whatever remains must come out, regardless of how large or small that balance is.
This distinction matters enormously for how you plan. The first question to answer is always which situation you are in.
What We Have Seen Work
I worked with a client who reached out immediately after their last parent passed, before they had touched a thing. That is the right move, and here is why.
We sat down and looked at their full picture. What did they actually need the money for right now? Were there debts to pay off, college coming for their kids, immediate estate expenses? Once we understood the real needs, we laid two scenarios side by side.
Taking everything in year one produced a tax bill that stopped the conversation cold. They had not expected the number to be that large, and seeing it in writing changed how they were thinking about everything.
Taking roughly a tenth of the account each year over the decade, factoring in assumed growth still inside the account during that time, produced a projected tax bill that was considerably lower in any given year. And the net amount of money they would actually keep across the full ten years was substantially higher than the lump sum scenario, not necessarily because total taxes were lower across a decade, but because the remaining balance kept compounding while the annual tax hit stayed more manageable.
They chose the systematic approach. They have not reached the final year yet, and that last distribution will likely be the largest of the ten, but the overall picture looks significantly better than where they would have ended up by moving too fast.
All figures in scenarios like this are illustrative and depend on your specific tax situation, account size, and what markets do during that window. Your numbers will look different. The point is that there is a conversation worth having before you act.
What We Have Seen Go Wrong
One situation I think about often involved a family where the last parent had passed, and one of the adult children moved their portion of the inherited money into their own account before reaching out to anyone.
By the time they called me asking whether anything could be done, the answer was no. Once that money moved, it was treated as a full distribution. The entire amount became taxable income that year. There was no undoing it, no workaround, no fix.
I did not spend much time on how or why it happened. It was a painful situation, and the last thing they needed was salt in the wound. What I will say here is this: the rules around inherited retirement accounts are not intuitive, the stakes are high, and the single most important move you can make is the one you make before you do anything else with the account. Call first. Move second. Or better yet, do not move at all until you understand exactly what you are doing and why.
If Your Parents Are Still Living, This Post Is Still for You
If you are reading this because you expect to inherit retirement money someday, and that day has not yet arrived, you are in the best position of all. You have time.
Have a conversation now, before it becomes an emergency. What does the account hold? What might your own income look like in ten years, when distributions would hit? Is there an opportunity for your parents to convert some or all of that account to a Roth before they pass? An inherited Roth IRA still carries the ten-year rule, but qualified distributions come out tax-free. For your heirs, that is an entirely different calculation.
Depending on the situation, your parents might also consider taking distributions from the IRA now, paying the tax, and gifting the after-tax proceeds to you while they are alive. If they are currently in a lower tax bracket than you will be when you inherit, the math can favor that move. Just know that a large IRA withdrawal does not happen in a vacuum. It can set off its own chain of consequences on your parents’ side of the ledger, from higher Medicare premiums to increased taxes on their Social Security. For the full picture of how those forces connect, see the Retirement Tax Avalanche.
None of this is complicated when you plan it in advance. All of it becomes painful when you are trying to fix it after the fact.
One More Thing If You Are 63 or Older
If your parent passes when you are 63 or older, there is a second financial consequence almost no one sees coming.
Medicare uses a two-year lookback to set your premiums. A large income year at 63 shows up on your Medicare bill at 65. A large income year at 64 shows up at 66, and so on.
Go back to the example we used. Say your parent left you a $650,000 IRA and you earn $150,000 a year. Your total income that year is $800,000. For a married couple, that pushes you into the top IRMAA tier, where each spouse pays roughly $578 more per month for Medicare Part B than someone at the base rate. For a couple, that is approximately $13,872 in additional Medicare costs arriving two years after the inheritance.
And unlike some income spikes, there is no appeal. Medicare allows certain life-changing events to be used to request a lower premium. Inheriting an IRA and taking a large distribution is not on that list. The surcharge is fixed. There is nothing you can do after the fact to reduce it.
There is also a cash flow problem hiding inside this. If the inheritance arrives in one year and most of it goes toward taxes and living expenses, the Medicare bill shows up two years later when the money is long gone. That is not a theoretical risk. It is a real bill, timed to arrive right when people are least prepared for it.
IRMAA brackets adjust annually, so verify current rates before planning around specific figures. The concept does not change: a large inherited IRA distribution creates a Medicare premium spike two years later, and proactive distribution planning is the only way to avoid it.
The Question Worth Sitting With
Your parent spent decades building that account. They deferred taxes year after year, often with the hope of leaving something meaningful for the people they loved.
Did they leave it to you? Or did they leave most of it to the IRS?
The answer depends almost entirely on the call you make next, and when you make it.
If you have inherited a pre-tax IRA or 401(k) and have not yet made any withdrawals, reach out before you do. If you have already started but have options remaining, there may still be room to optimize. And if you are a parent sitting on a large pre-tax account, the most valuable thing you can do today is start the conversation about what that inheritance is actually going to cost your kids, and whether there is still time to change the outcome.
If you would like to work through what that looks like for your specific numbers, that is exactly what a Retirement Income Blueprint call is for. Fifteen to thirty minutes, no cost, no obligation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Under rules that took effect in 2020, most non-spouse beneficiaries who inherit a traditional IRA or 401(k) must empty the account within ten years of the original owner’s death. The old stretch IRA, which allowed heirs to spread distributions over their own life expectancy, is gone for most people. The ten-year clock starts the year after the original owner dies.
It depends on whether your parent had already started Required Minimum Distributions before they passed. If they had not started RMDs, you have flexibility in how you take distributions across the ten years, as long as the account is empty by the end of year ten. If they had already started RMDs, you are required to take at least the minimum distribution every year for all ten years, with whatever remains coming out in year ten.
The full amount becomes ordinary taxable income in that year, stacked on top of whatever else you earned. If you earn $150,000 and inherit a $650,000 IRA and take it all at once, your taxable income that year reaches $800,000. The top federal bracket applies to a large portion of that. State taxes apply on top of that. And if you are 63 or older, the income spike creates a Medicare premium surcharge that arrives two years later with no appeal available.
The ten-year rule applies to inherited Roth IRAs as well, but qualified distributions from a Roth come out tax-free. The account still has to be emptied within ten years, but there is no income tax on the withdrawals. This is one of the most powerful arguments for Roth conversions during a parent’s lifetime. For more on how that planning works, see Roth Conversion Strategy: Whose Tax Plan Are You On?
Medicare uses a two-year lookback to set your Part B and Part D premiums. A large inherited IRA distribution in one year can push your income into a higher IRMAA tier, adding hundreds of dollars per month per person to your Medicare costs starting two years later. Unlike some income changes, an inherited IRA distribution does not qualify for a Medicare premium appeal. IRMAA brackets adjust annually, so verify current figures before planning around specific amounts.
An inherited IRA is often the final link in a chain that started decades earlier with tax deferral decisions made by your parents. The same forces that created the problem, frozen Social Security tax thresholds, Medicare surcharge cliffs, and the compounding effect of pre-tax accounts, apply to the inheritance as well. For the full picture of how these forces connect, see the Retirement Tax Avalanche and The Widow’s Tax Trap.
About Kurt H. Jackson
Experience: Kurt H. Jackson has spent more than 16 years working directly with retirees and pre-retirees in Missouri, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, and Florida. After the dot-com crash in 2003, he started reverse-engineering the traditional save-and-withdraw model, and what he found changed everything about how he approaches retirement income. Before founding KJ Financial, he spent 20+ years as a Certified Mortgage Planner working with more than 1,000 clients.
Expertise: Kurt is a Retirement Lifestyle Architect and the creator of the Lifestyle-First Retirement Income Planning framework. He is Life and Health Insurance Licensed in MO (8035802), NE, KS, IA (NPN 14954049), and FL (W192044). His practice focuses exclusively on insurance-based, tax-optimized retirement income strategies including Protected Lifetime Income (PLI) design, Roth conversion planning, and the Tax Avalanche. He does not manage investments or sell securities.
Authoritativeness: Kurt founded KJ Financial and operates MaxMyRetirementIncome.com as a dedicated educational resource for retirees. His Lifestyle-First framework is built on peer-reviewed research from Wade Pfau, Morningstar, BlackRock, and EBRI. Every income figure published on this site is based on actual carrier quotes and current research, updated regularly.
Trustworthiness: KJ Financial is a compliance-first firm. All income figures are presented as illustrative and hypothetical. Kurt H. Jackson is not a securities broker, registered investment advisor, or CPA. Guarantees rely on the claims-paying ability of the issuing insurance company.
1014 E. 5th St., Maryville, MO 64468 | Direct: 816.582.5532 | [email protected] | www.MaxMyRetirementIncome.com
Educational only. Not tax, legal, or individualized advice. Tax rules are complex, change often, and depend on your individual circumstances. The scenarios described are illustrative; actual results will vary based on account size, income, tax rates, and market conditions. Please work with a qualified tax professional before making decisions about inherited retirement accounts.